Workshop on Quality and Authenticity of Web Resources
In this phase of digital era, when the old culture
of books are slowly and steadily moving towards internet; it seems that new
young generation are on the path of becoming internetwarms.
Though the emerging
world of internet is full of information, do we rely on it blindly? There is no doubt that we like to use internet for grasping
the knowledge or knowing about newer things but when it comes to the point of
academic research work, how far the authenticity of web resources is
certituded?
Workshop on Quality and Authenticity of Web Resources, 19/11/2019
While doing academic and research works we do not rely
blindly on any web resource as these works required quality of reading and
writing. In order to spread awareness about the authenticity of web sources, a
very fruitful session was conducted by Dilip Barad sir on 19th
November, 2019.
Turnitin
Turnitin is an Americal commercial, internet based
plagiarism detection service which helps to promote academic integrity,
streamline grading and feedback, deter plagiarism and thus helps to improve
students' outcome.
Sparknotes, Shamoops, Gradesaver, Enotes and so on,
these are known web sites which are widely used by students. But when the
matter comes on the point of productivity standard of content, it almost fails
to achieve it at certain level. One can understand the productivity standard on
any website by observing it through certain parameters such as quality
assumptions and quantitive assumptions. Turnitin provides us a rubric form
given into the research paper of it, based on evolution of web sources widely
used by students. This rubric helps in
to check out the productivity or authenticity level of any web resource.
Here are some websites(regarding particular articles) evaluated by me on
parameters measured by rubric.
blackpast.org (Nagritude Movement)
Points
|
0 to 4
|
Authoritative
|
3
|
Educational
Value
|
3.5
|
Intent
|
3
|
Originality
|
2.5
|
Quality
|
3
|
The article which I referred on this site was contributed by Anna Miklin, a historian who also researched independently on the Negritude Movement. In this one properly she cited the sources which she referred as well as the content of it seems rich in quality.
Points
|
0 to 4
|
Authoritative
|
2
|
Educational Value
|
2
|
Intent
|
2.5
|
Originality
|
2.5
|
Quality
|
3
|
It widely provides the content in easy language but it seems not useful for academic or research purpose. It seems ok to just grasp only basic idea about any topic. As far as productivity or authenticity is concerned, we do not rely blindly on this one.
Points
|
0 to 4
|
Authoritative
|
3
|
Educational Value
|
2.5
|
Intent
|
3
|
Originality
|
3
|
Quality
|
3
|
In nutshell, while doing any academic or research work by using web resources we must have to take into consideration above mentioned parameters as well as it required us to check the productivity standard of any work.
Comments
Post a Comment